Powered By Blogger

Saturday 17 August 2013

ARMAGEDDON: A BATTLE OF GOD ALMIGHTY
(Revelation 16:14, 16)

  Prof: Satheesh Kumar
Academic Dean - AECS
Introduction


The name Armageddon is found only in Rev 16:16. The generally accepted view is that the word ‘har’ which means ‘mountain’ (or mountains) and that ‘magedon’ refers to Megiddo, therefore, Armageddon generally means “the mountain of Megiddo”, the biblical city near which many notable battles were fought. For example, Deborah and Barak defeated Canaanites (Judges 4 & 5). Gideon triumphed over the Midianites (Judges 7). Saul was slain in the battle with Philistines (1 Sam. 31:8). Ahaziah was slain by Jehu (2 Kings 9:27). Josiah was slain by the Egyptians (2 Kings 23:29-30; 2 Chr. 35:22). Therefore, it will be a place of struggle between the powers of good and evil. Some scholars suggest that ‘Armageddon is used not as a name for a particular locality but as a symbolic term for the final conflict’.[1]

In the war of Armageddon God will deal with the nations for number of reasons: because of their persecution of Israel (Joel 3:2), because of their sinfulness (Rev. 19:15), and because of their godlessness (Rev. 16:9).

There are several geographical locations are involved in the war of Armageddon. The followings are the other locations of this war extending from Esdraelon to Edom or Idumea, south of Jerusalem (Isa. 34 and 63):

1.       In the valley of Jehoshaphat (Joel 3:2, 13).
2.      In the “valley of Passengers” (Ezek. 39:11).
3.      In the city of Jerusalem, the center of conflict (Zech. 12:2-11; 14:2).
4.      In the mountains of Megiddo (Rev. 16:16).
5.      In the land of Edom (Isa. 63:1).

Therefore, the war of Armageddon will cover up the entire land of Palestine. J. D. Pentecost states in this regard:

Thus the campaign is pictured as extending from the plains of Esdraelon on the north, down through Jerusalem, extending out to the valley of Jehoshaphat on the east and to Edom on the south.[2]

In the prophecy of Ezekiel 38:9, 16, he says that all of these invaders will “cover the land” (Ezek. 38:9, 16) which includes all of these land. The blood will flow as high as the horses’ bridles for a distance of about 1600 (180 miles) furlongs (Rev. 14:20). This is the distance area of judgment around the city of Jerusalem. This is a picture of great slaughter (Isa. 63:1-3).[3] Therefore, the war of Armageddon will extend from the middle of Tribulation (namely the second half of Tribulation, 3 ½ years, Dan. 9:24-27) till the end of Great Tribulation.

Gog in Ezekiel 38 and Armageddon in Revelation 16:16 are not the Same
Before going for further discussion the misunderstanding about the Gog in Ezekiel 38 and Armageddon in Revelation 16:16 should be settled. The followings are the reason for the argument:
1.       In the battle of Gog definite allies are mentioned (Ezek. 38), while in Armageddon all the nations are involved (Joel 3:2; Zeph. 3:8; Zech. 12:3; 14:4).
2.      Gog comes from the north (Ezek. 38:6, 15; 39:2), whereas in Armageddon the armies come from the whole earth (Rev. 16:14).
3.      Gog comes to take spoils (Ezek. 38:11-12), whereas at Armageddon the nations assemble to destroy the people of God (Rev. 16:14).
4.      There is protest against Gog’s invasion (Ezek. 38:13), but at Armageddon there is no protest but all nations join together against Jerusalem (Ezek. 14:4).
5.      Gog is the head of the armies (Ezek. 38:7) whereas in Armageddon the Beast is the head (Rev. 19:19).
6.      Gog is overthrown by natural calamities (Ezek. 38:22) whereas in Armageddon the armies destroyed by Christ himself (Rev. 19:15).
7.      Gog’s armies seem to be organized in the open field (Ezek. 39:5) whereas in Armageddon the armies are seen in the city of Jerusalem (Zech. 14:2-4).  
Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38 and Gog and Magog in Revelation 20:8 are not the Same
1.       Ezekiel mentioned only a northern union involved in the war. But in Revelation all the nations of the earth are gathered together.
2.      The context in Ezekiel shows that this invasion is before the institution of the millennium but in Revelation the millennium has been in existence for a thousand years.
3.      In Ezekiel the bodies of the slain require the labor of seven months to dispose of the dead (Ezek. 39:12). But in Revelation 20:9 the slain are said to be “devoured” by fire so that no disposal is necessary.
4.      In Ezekiel the invasion is seen to be followed by the millennium (ch. 40 - 48). But in Revelation this invasion is followed by the new heaven and the new earth.  
Armageddon and Antichrist
The Antichrist will make a peaceful covenant with Israel for 3 ½ years (Dan. 9:26-27). Thus this condition will exists for 3 ½ years, after which the covenant will be broken by the Roman authorities and the period known as the Great Tribulation (Matt. 24:21) will begins. This tribulation on the earth is evidently caused by Satan, because he will be cast out of heaven into the earth at the middle of the Tribulation period (Rev. 12:9). At this time Satan will go forth in great wrath (Rev. 12:12) to attack the remnant of Israel and the saints of God (Rev. 12:17). Therefore, the war of Armageddon will take place in the middle of Daniel’s 70th week or middle of Tribulation. The war of Armageddon should take place after the restoration of Israel to their land (Ezek. 37). This will be discussed later in detail.
Time of Armageddon in General
The Armageddon will take place after the beginning of the restoration of Israel when they inhabit their own land (Ezek. 38:10, 11). This would indicate that it takes place after the covenant made by the “prince that shall come” of Daniel 9:27. The invasion should take place when Israel is dwelling in peace (false peace by the covenant, Isa. 28:18) in the land (Ezek. 38:11). If the war of Armageddon would take place at the end of Tribulation Israel cannot be referred to be peaceful at that time. Israel could not be said to be at peace at the end of the Tribulation period, because the land has been already destroyed by invasion (Zech. 14:1-3).
Views on the Time of Armageddon
The followings are the various views on the time of Armageddon which will conclude the dispensation of Church age:
1.    Armageddon will take place prior to the Rapture of the Church (David L. Cooper propounded this view).
2.   Armageddon will take place at the beginning of the Millennium (Arno C. Gaebelein presented this view).
3.   Armageddon will take place at the end of Millennium (some theologians held this view).
4.   Armageddon will take place at the end of the Tribulation (Most students of the Bible belief this view).
5.   Armageddon will take place at the middle of the seven year period of Tribulation or Daniel’s 70th week (J. D. Pentecost).
Problems of Each View in Relation to Armageddon:
The followings are various views on the time of Armageddon.
1.   Before the Rapture
Problems:
1)   This prophecy is addressed to Israel (Ezek. 38:8, 16), the expression “in the latter years” (v. 8) and “in the latter days” (v. 16) contrast to the doctrine of imminent coming of Christ.
2)  Israel will not have a land until the “prince that shall come” and make a covenant, this must be fulfilled before Armageddon take place (Dan. 9:27).
3)  The “times of Gentile” would not be end at the Rapture, it will continue till the end of Tribulation (Luke 21:24).
4)  Israel should dwell in the land peacefully before the Armageddon take place (Ezek. 38:11).
2.     At the Beginning of the Millennium
Problems:
1)      Ezekiel tells us that the land will be defiled by the dead bodies for seven months (Ezek. 39:12). But the Bible does not tell us the cleansing of the dead bodies in the land by the return of the Messiah.
2)     According to Revelation 20:1-3 Satan will be bound at the beginning of the millennium therefore Satan cannot be operative to make war (Armageddon) against Israel.
3)     Isaiah 2:1-4 states that wars will cease with the advent of Christ and the inauguration of millennium, then where and how Armageddon will take place? (Isa. 2:1-4).
                              
3.     At the end of the Millennium
Problems:
1)      Gog and Magog of Ezekiel and Gog and Magog in Revelation 20:8 are not the same (see page 2).
4.     At the end of Tribulation
Problems:
1)      The passage in Ezekiel does not mention a battle (Ezek. 38:20-23). The destruction there is directly by the hand of God through the nature. God himself is the agent of destruction not through a war.
2)     In Ezekiel the invasion is by the king of the north with his allies, which are limited in number whereas in Revelation 19 and Zechariah 14 all the nations of the earth are seen to be gathered together for the war.
3)     In Ezekiel the destruction (not the war) take place in the mountains of Israel (Ezek. 39:2-4), whereas in Armageddon the events will take place at Jerusalem (Zech. 12:2; 14:2), at the valley of Jehoshaphat (Joel 3:12) and Edom (Isa. 63:1).
4)     In Ezekiel Israel is said to be dwelling in her land in peace and safety (Ezek. 38:11) but in Revelation 12:14-17 Israel is not going to dwell in the land in peace and safety during the latter half of the seventieth week, but will be special target of Satan’s attack.

5.     At the Middle of Tribulation Period
Arguments in favor of this view:
1)      The invasion will take place at a time when Israel is dwelling in their own land (Ezek. 38:8). Israel will not have their own land until the covenant being made by the “prince that shall come” with the Jews (the future Roman prince, the little horn of Dan. 7:8 who will be the head of the Roman Empire seeks to settle the Arab-Israeli dispute by giving Israel the right to occupy the land) (cf. Dan. 9:27).
2)     The invasion (attack) will take place when Israel is dwelling in peace in the land (Ezek. 38:11). This peace is not promised by the Messiah as some thought. But rather this peace will be falsely promised by the Antichrist with Israel (“your agreement with hell” Isa. 28:18).
3)     The re-gathering of Israel is described in chapter 37 of Ezekiel. Israel could not be said to be at peace at the end of the tribulation period, because their land is already been destroyed by invasion (Zech. 14:1-3) and the people scattered (Zech. 13:8, 9).
4)     The reason of breaking the covenant is because of the invasion of the King of the North (Dan. 11:40-41). This invasion will take place at middle of the week. The king of the South (referred to king of Egypt, Dan. 11:5-35, vv. 42, 43, joined by the Libyans and Nubians v. 43) and the king of the North (this invader will be the Assyrians, Isa. 30:31-33; 31:8,9; Mich. 5:5; some suggest it will be Gog, Ezek. 38:15) will fight against the Antichrist. Israel will be occupied and many Jews will flee, seeking refuge among the Gentile nations (Rev. 12:14-16).[4]
5)     When the Antichrist hears of this invasion, he will move his army from Europe into the Middle East, sweeping through many countries . . . like a flood (v. 40). He will move quickly into the land of Israel, the Beautiful Land (v. 41; cf. v. 16; 8:9). His first strike will be against Egypt (11:42-43a), for Egypt and her Arab allies (Libyans and Nubians, v. 43) are the ones who will initiate the invasion on Israel. On this occasion the king will not conquer the territory of Edom, Moab, and . . . Ammon (v. 41), now included in the present kingdom of Jordan. But he will gain control over “many countries.”
6)     Then the Antichrist will hear alarming reports from the east (Dan. 11:45-45) (probably referring to an invasion by a massive army of 200 million soldiers from east of the Euphrates River, Rev. 9:16) and from the north (perhaps another attack by the king of the North; cf. Dan. 11:40). Enraged, the Antichrist will set out to destroy . . . many of the invaders. Then he will occupy Israel and will pitch his royal tents between the seas, that is, between the Dead Sea and the Mediterranean Sea, at the beautiful holy mountain, probably Jerusalem. Posing as Christ, the Antichrist will set up his headquarters in Jerusalem, the same city from which Christ will rule the world in the Millennium (Zech. 14:4, 17). But God will destroy this king (Dan. 7:11, 26) at the personal appearance of Christ (Rev. 19:19-20).
7)     Satan will be cast out of heaven at the middle of Tribulation (Rev. 12:7-13). His first act in opposition to Israel is to move the King of the North to this invasion. This will be the beginning of great campaign which begins at the middle of the week and will continue until the Gentile powers at the return of Christ. This great campaign will extend over a 3 ½ year period.
8)    Many will be saved during the Tribulation not just at the end of Tribulation (Rev. 7:4-17).
The Chronology of Armageddon at the Middle of the Tribulation
1.       Israel will make a false covenant with the Best and occupies her land in a false security (Dan. 9:27; Ezek. 38:8, 11).
2.      Because of a desire for spoil at the expense of an easy prey, the King of the North, satanically motivated, invades Palestine (Ezek. 38:11; Joel 2:1-21; Isa. 10:12; 30:31-33; 31:8, 9).
3.      The Beast breaks his covenant with Israel and moves into the land (Dan. 11:41-45).
4.      The King of the North is destroyed on the mountains of Israel (Ezek. 39:1-4).
5.      The land of Palestine is occupied by the armies of the Beast (Dan. 11:45).
6.      At this time the great coalition of nations takes place that forms one government under the Beast (Psa. 2:1-3; Rev. 13:7).
7.      The Kings of the East are brought in against the armies of the Beast (Rev. 16:12).
When the nations of the earth are gathered together around Jerusalem (Zech. 14:1-3) and valley of Jehoshaphat (Joel 3:2), the Lord returns to destroy all Gentile world powers so that He might rule the nations Himself. This is further described in Zech. 12:1-9; 14:1-4; Isa. 33:1-34:17; 63:1-6; 66:15:16; Jer. 25:27-33; Rev. 20:7-10.



[1] International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, revised edition, Copyright © 1979 by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
[2] J. Dwight Pentecost, Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology, (Secunderabad: OM, 1999), 
341.
[3] Walvoord, The Bible knowledge commentary: An exposition of the scriptures (2:965). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[4]Walvoord, The Bible knowledge commentary: An exposition of the scriptures (1:1372). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.

No comments:

Post a Comment